Messages in this thread | | | From | Sergey Senozhatsky <> | Date | Mon, 4 Mar 2019 20:07:03 +0900 | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH v1 08/25] printk: add ring buffer and kthread |
| |
On (03/04/19 19:00), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > > But in general, channels which depend on preemptible printk will become > totally useless in some cases. >
Which brings me to a question - what are those messages/channels? Not important enough to be printed on consoles immediately, yet important enough to pass the suppress_message_printing() check. We may wave those semi-important messages good bye, I'm afraid, preemptible printk will take care of it.
So... do we have a case here? Do we really need printk-kthread?
-ss
| |