lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Mar]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    Date
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] openvswitch: fix flow actions reallocation
    On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 3:11 PM Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com> wrote:
    >
    > The flow action buffer can be resized if it's not big enough to contain
    > all the requested flow actions. However, this resize doesn't take into
    > account the new requested size, the buffer is only increased by a factor
    > of 2x. This might be not enough to contain the new data, causing a
    > buffer overflow, for example:
    >
    > [ 42.044472] =============================================================================
    > [ 42.045608] BUG kmalloc-96 (Not tainted): Redzone overwritten
    > [ 42.046415] -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >
    > [ 42.047715] Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint
    > [ 42.047716] INFO: 0x8bf2c4a5-0x720c0928. First byte 0x0 instead of 0xcc
    > [ 42.048677] INFO: Slab 0xbc6d2040 objects=29 used=18 fp=0xdc07dec4 flags=0x2808101
    > [ 42.049743] INFO: Object 0xd53a3464 @offset=2528 fp=0xccdcdebb
    >
    > [ 42.050747] Redzone 76f1b237: cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc ........
    > [ 42.051839] Object d53a3464: 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 0c 00 00 00 6c 00 00 00 kkkkkkkk....l...
    > [ 42.053015] Object f49a30cc: 6c 00 0c 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 03 78 a3 15 f6 l...........x...
    > [ 42.054203] Object acfe4220: 20 00 02 00 ff ff ff ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ...............
    > [ 42.055370] Object 21024e91: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
    > [ 42.056541] Object 070e04c3: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
    > [ 42.057797] Object 948a777a: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
    > [ 42.059061] Redzone 8bf2c4a5: 00 00 00 00 ....
    > [ 42.060189] Padding a681b46e: 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a ZZZZZZZZ
    >
    > Fix by making sure the new buffer is properly resized to contain all the
    > requested data.
    >
    > BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1813244
    > Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>

    This must be rare combination of action that trigger this case.

    > ---
    > net/openvswitch/flow_netlink.c | 4 ++--
    > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
    >
    > diff --git a/net/openvswitch/flow_netlink.c b/net/openvswitch/flow_netlink.c
    > index 691da853bef5..e6f789badaa3 100644
    > --- a/net/openvswitch/flow_netlink.c
    > +++ b/net/openvswitch/flow_netlink.c
    > @@ -2306,14 +2306,14 @@ static struct nlattr *reserve_sfa_size(struct sw_flow_actions **sfa,
    >
    > struct sw_flow_actions *acts;
    > int new_acts_size;
    > - int req_size = NLA_ALIGN(attr_len);
    > + size_t req_size = NLA_ALIGN(attr_len);
    > int next_offset = offsetof(struct sw_flow_actions, actions) +
    > (*sfa)->actions_len;
    >
    > if (req_size <= (ksize(*sfa) - next_offset))
    > goto out;
    >
    > - new_acts_size = ksize(*sfa) * 2;
    > + new_acts_size = max(req_size, ksize(*sfa) * 2);
    >
    Don't we need to compare current_action_size+req_size and
    current_action_size*2 here ?

    > if (new_acts_size > MAX_ACTIONS_BUFSIZE) {
    > if ((MAX_ACTIONS_BUFSIZE - next_offset) < req_size) {
    > --
    > 2.19.1
    >

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2019-03-28 04:44    [W:4.351 / U:0.016 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site