Messages in this thread | | | From | Masahiro Yamada <> | Date | Tue, 26 Mar 2019 15:54:38 +0900 | Subject | Re: [v5] coccinelle: semantic code search for missing put_device() |
| |
On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 1:19 AM Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de> wrote: > > > Applied to linux-kbuild. > > A questionable development version was integrated for this SmPL script.
Sorry for my bad job.
I usually use LKML patchwork to find patches.
When I searched "Wen Yang", v6 did not show up for some reasons. https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/project/lkml/list/?series=&submitter=22638&state=*&q=&archive=&delegate=
So, I just thought v5 was the latest one and I was completely missing the context.
Apology.
Masahiro
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/scripts/coccinelle/free/put_device.cocci?id=da9cfb87a44da61f2403c4312916befcb6b6d7e8 > > https://lore.kernel.org/cocci/201902191014156680299@zte.com.cn/ > > > Now I am curious on how such a source code analysis approach will be > improved further. > Which changes will get the desired acceptance? > > https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1053979/ > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1553321671-27749-1-git-send-email-wen.yang99@zte.com.cn/ > https://systeme.lip6.fr/pipermail/cocci/2019-March/005679.html > > Regards, > Markus -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada
| |