Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <> | Subject | [PATCH 4.9 26/30] scsi: ufs: fix wrong command type of UTRD for UFSHCI v2.1 | Date | Tue, 26 Mar 2019 15:30:05 +0900 |
| |
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: kehuanlin <chgokhl@gmail.com>
commit 83dc7e3dea76b77b6bcc289eb86c5b5c145e8dff upstream.
Since the command type of UTRD in UFS 2.1 specification is the same with UFS 2.0. And it assumes the future UFS specification will follow the same definition.
Signed-off-by: kehuanlin <kehuanlin@pinecone.net> Reviewed-by: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
--- drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 14 ++++++++------ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c @@ -1348,10 +1348,11 @@ static int ufshcd_comp_devman_upiu(struc u32 upiu_flags; int ret = 0; - if (hba->ufs_version == UFSHCI_VERSION_20) - lrbp->command_type = UTP_CMD_TYPE_UFS_STORAGE; - else + if ((hba->ufs_version == UFSHCI_VERSION_10) || + (hba->ufs_version == UFSHCI_VERSION_11)) lrbp->command_type = UTP_CMD_TYPE_DEV_MANAGE; + else + lrbp->command_type = UTP_CMD_TYPE_UFS_STORAGE; ufshcd_prepare_req_desc_hdr(lrbp, &upiu_flags, DMA_NONE); if (hba->dev_cmd.type == DEV_CMD_TYPE_QUERY) @@ -1375,10 +1376,11 @@ static int ufshcd_comp_scsi_upiu(struct u32 upiu_flags; int ret = 0; - if (hba->ufs_version == UFSHCI_VERSION_20) - lrbp->command_type = UTP_CMD_TYPE_UFS_STORAGE; - else + if ((hba->ufs_version == UFSHCI_VERSION_10) || + (hba->ufs_version == UFSHCI_VERSION_11)) lrbp->command_type = UTP_CMD_TYPE_SCSI; + else + lrbp->command_type = UTP_CMD_TYPE_UFS_STORAGE; if (likely(lrbp->cmd)) { ufshcd_prepare_req_desc_hdr(lrbp, &upiu_flags,
| |