lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Mar]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 1/2] docs: Clarify the usage and sign-off requirements for Co-developed-by
On Fri, 22 Mar 2019 14:11:36 -0700
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> wrote:

> The documentation for Co-developed-by is a bit light on details, e.g. it
> doesn't explicitly state that:
>
> - Multiple Co-developed-by tags are perfectly acceptable
> - Co-developed-by and Signed-off-by must be paired together
> - SOB ordering should still follow standard sign-off procedure
>
> Lack of explicit direction has resulted in developers taking a variety
> of approaches, often lacking any intent whatsoever, e.g. scattering SOBs
> willy-nilly, collecting them all at the end or the beginning, etc...
> Tweak the wording to make it clear that multiple co-authors are allowed,
> and document the expectation that standard sign-off procedures are to
> be followed.
>
> The use of "original author" has also led to confusion as many patches
> don't have just one "original" author, e.g. when multiple developers
> are involved from the genesis of the patch. Remove all usage of
> "original" and instead call out that Co-developed-by is simply a way to
> provide attribution in addition to the From tag, i.e. neither tag is
> intended to imply anything with regard to who did what.
>
> Provide examples to (hopefully) eliminate any ambiguity.

I've applied this. Joe, do you want to handle the checkpatch.pl patch, or
would you prefer I take that one too?

Thanks,

jon

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-03-25 17:32    [W:0.052 / U:0.436 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site