Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 25 Mar 2019 13:51:18 +0200 | From | Andy Shevchenko <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Documentation: acpi: Add an example for PRP0001 |
| |
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 10:31:13AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 2:47 PM Thomas Preston > <thomas.preston@codethink.co.uk> wrote: > > > > Add an example for the magic PRP0001 device ID which allows matching > > ACPI devices against drivers using OF Device Tree compatible property. > > It wasn't clear to me that PRP0001 could be used in _CID. > > Mika, Andy, can you have a look at this, please?
Good to me, Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Though one thing I would like to add (not directly related to the patch per se), i.e. it would be nice to keep such examples under meta-acpi [1] umbrella as a database for such excerpts.
Thomas, can you do that?
[1]: https://github.com/westeri/meta-acpi
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Preston <thomas.preston@codethink.co.uk> > > --- > > Documentation/acpi/enumeration.txt | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/acpi/enumeration.txt b/Documentation/acpi/enumeration.txt > > index 7bcf9c3d9fbe..391db643065a 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/acpi/enumeration.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/acpi/enumeration.txt > > @@ -410,6 +410,33 @@ Specifically, the device IDs returned by _HID and preceding PRP0001 in the _CID > > return package will be checked first. Also in that case the bus type the device > > will be enumerated to depends on the device ID returned by _HID. > > > > +For example, the following ACPI sample might be used to enumerate an lm75-type > > +I2C temperature sensor and match it to the driver using the Device Tree > > +namespace link: > > + > > + Device (TMP0) > > + { > > + Name (_HID, "TITMP75") /* _HID will appear in sysfs */ > > + Name (_CID, "PRP0001") > > + Name (_DSD, Package() { > > + ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"), > > + Package () { > > + Package (2) { "compatible", "ti,tmp75" }, > > + } > > + }) > > + Method (_CRS, 0, Serialized) > > + { > > + Name (SBUF, ResourceTemplate () > > + { > > + I2cSerialBusV2 (0x48, ControllerInitiated, > > + 400000, AddressingMode7Bit, > > + "\\_SB.PCI0.I2C1", 0x00, > > + ResourceConsumer, , Exclusive,) > > + }) > > + Return (SBUF) > > + } > > + } > > + > > It is valid to define device objects with a _HID returning PRP0001 and without > > the "compatible" property in the _DSD or a _CID as long as one of their > > ancestors provides a _DSD with a valid "compatible" property. Such device > > -- > > 2.11.0 > >
-- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
| |