Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 22 Mar 2019 09:48:14 -0400 | From | Joel Fernandes <> | Subject | Re: [diamon-discuss] [RELEASE] LTTng-modules 2.9.11, 2.10.8, 2.11.0-rc2 (Linux kernel tracer) |
| |
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 09:13:56AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 08:41:22 -0400 > Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org> wrote: > > > Also does it also make sense for lttng ring buffer to use the ftrace code for > > ring buffer, or make the ftrace ring buffer better and have lttng use it? Or > > is the lttng ring buffer design too radically different? > > We tried in the past and never actually got something that we both > could agree on. Now I believe the user space tools depend on the way > each one is, so to change one will break the tools that read it.
I understand :-\
thanks,
- Joel
| |