Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/6] sysctl: add pending proc_do_large_bitmap fix | From | Eric Sandeen <> | Date | Thu, 21 Mar 2019 12:13:07 -0500 |
| |
On 3/20/19 5:28 PM, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > Andrew, Kees, > > Eric sent a fix out for proc_do_large_bitmap() last month for when > using a large input buffer. After patch review a test case for the issue > was built and submitted. I noticed there were a few issues with the > tests, but instead of just asking Eric to address them I've taken > care of them and ammended the commit where necessary. There's a > few issues he reported which I also address and fix in this series. > > Since we *do* expect users of these scripts to also use them on older > kernels, I've also addressed not breaking calling the script for them, > and gives us an easy way to easily extend our tests cases for future > kernels as well. > > Before anyone considers these for stable as minor fixes, I'd recommend > we also address the discrepancy on the read side of things: modify the > test script to use diff against the target file instead of using the > temp file. > > Eric Sandeen (2): > test_sysctl: add proc_do_large_bitmap() test case > sysctl: Fix proc_do_large_bitmap for large input buffers
Isn't this missing:
[PATCH] sysctl: add proc_do_large_bitmap test node
?
> Luis Chamberlain (4): > test_sysctl: remove superfluous test_reqs() > test_sysctl: load module before testing for it > test_sysctl: ignore diff output on verify_diff_w() > test_sysctl: allow graceful use on older kernels > > kernel/sysctl.c | 30 ++++- > lib/test_sysctl.c | 18 ++- > tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/sysctl.sh | 161 +++++++++++++++++++---- > 3 files changed, 178 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) >
| |