Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 0/1] mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeholder versions | From | John Hubbard <> | Date | Tue, 19 Mar 2019 12:24:07 -0700 |
| |
On 3/19/19 11:12 AM, Christopher Lameter wrote: > On Fri, 8 Mar 2019, john.hubbard@gmail.com wrote: > >> We seem to have pretty solid consensus on the concept and details of the >> put_user_pages() approach. Or at least, if we don't, someone please speak >> up now. Christopher Lameter, especially, since you had some concerns >> recently. > > My concerns do not affect this patchset which just marks the get/put for > the pagecache. The problem was that the description was making claims that > were a bit misleading and seemed to prescribe a solution. > > So lets get this merged. Whatever the solution will be, we will need this > markup. >
Sounds good. Do you care to promote that thought into a formal ACK for me? :)
thanks, -- John Hubbard NVIDIA
| |