Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Fri, 15 Mar 2019 09:41:31 +0100 | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] futex:fix robust futex alignment exception |
| |
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 03:44:38AM +0000, chenjie6@huawei.com wrote: > From: chen jie <chenjie6@huawei.com>
> [11542.215247] [<c017b1d4>] (cmpxchg_futex_value_locked) from [<c017da50>] (handle_futex_death+0x78/0xcc) > [11542.215259] [<c017da50>] (handle_futex_death) from [<c017dba8>] (exit_robust_list+0x104/0x160) > [11542.215273] [<c017dba8>] (exit_robust_list) from [<c011b40c>] (mm_release+0x1c/0x108) > [11542.215287] [<c011b40c>] (mm_release) from [<c011f9a4>] (do_exit+0x218/0x9a4) > [11542.215299] [<c011f9a4>] (do_exit) from [<c0120250>] (do_group_exit+0xac/0xf4) > [11542.215311] [<c0120250>] (do_group_exit) from [<c01202a8>] (__wake_up_parent+0x0/0x18)
> Signed-off-by: chen jie <chenjie6@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
However, should there not also be alignment tests on set_robust_list()?
Also; do_futex() should probably check uaddr and uaddr2.
That is; why aren't there any alignment tests anywhere? Or am I just gone blind?
> --- > kernel/futex.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c > index a0514e0..70231c4 100644 > --- a/kernel/futex.c > +++ b/kernel/futex.c > @@ -3440,6 +3440,9 @@ static int handle_futex_death(u32 __user *uaddr, struct task_struct *curr, int p > { > u32 uval, uninitialized_var(nval), mval; > > + if (((unsigned long)uaddr & 0x3) > 0) > + return -1; > + > retry: > if (get_user(uval, uaddr)) > return -1; > -- > 1.8.3.4 >
| |