Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 12 Mar 2019 15:02:46 +0530 | From | Gautham R Shenoy <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3] powerpc/pseries: Only wait for dying CPU after call to rtas_stop_self() |
| |
Hello Thiago,
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 04:35:17PM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > When testing DLPAR CPU add/remove on a system under stress, > pseries_cpu_die() doesn't wait long enough for a CPU to die: > > [ 446.983944] cpu 148 (hwid 148) Ready to die... > [ 446.984062] cpu 149 (hwid 149) Ready to die... > [ 446.993518] cpu 150 (hwid 150) Ready to die... > [ 446.993543] Querying DEAD? cpu 150 (150) shows 2 > [ 446.994098] cpu 151 (hwid 151) Ready to die... > [ 447.133726] cpu 136 (hwid 136) Ready to die... > [ 447.403532] cpu 137 (hwid 137) Ready to die... > [ 447.403772] cpu 138 (hwid 138) Ready to die... > [ 447.403839] cpu 139 (hwid 139) Ready to die... > [ 447.403887] cpu 140 (hwid 140) Ready to die... > [ 447.403937] cpu 141 (hwid 141) Ready to die... > [ 447.403979] cpu 142 (hwid 142) Ready to die... > [ 447.404038] cpu 143 (hwid 143) Ready to die... > [ 447.513546] cpu 128 (hwid 128) Ready to die... > [ 447.693533] cpu 129 (hwid 129) Ready to die... > [ 447.693999] cpu 130 (hwid 130) Ready to die... > [ 447.703530] cpu 131 (hwid 131) Ready to die... > [ 447.704087] Querying DEAD? cpu 132 (132) shows 2 > [ 447.704102] cpu 132 (hwid 132) Ready to die... > [ 447.713534] cpu 133 (hwid 133) Ready to die... > [ 447.714064] Querying DEAD? cpu 134 (134) shows 2 > > This is a race between one CPU stopping and another one calling > pseries_cpu_die() to wait for it to stop. That function does a short busy > loop calling RTAS query-cpu-stopped-state on the stopping CPU to verify > that it is stopped, but I think there's a lot for the stopping CPU to do > which may take longer than this loop allows. > > As can be seen in the dmesg right before or after the "Querying DEAD?" > messages, if pseries_cpu_die() waited a little longer it would have seen > the CPU in the stopped state. > > What I think is going on is that CPU 134 was inactive at the time it was > unplugged. In that case, dlpar_offline_cpu() calls H_PROD on that CPU and > immediately calls pseries_cpu_die(). Meanwhile, the prodded CPU activates > and start the process of stopping itself. The busy loop is not long enough > to allow for the CPU to wake up and complete the stopping process. > > This can be a problem because if the busy loop finishes too early, then the > kernel may offline another CPU before the previous one finished dying, > which would lead to two concurrent calls to rtas-stop-self, which is > prohibited by the PAPR. > > We can make the race a lot more even if we only start querying if the CPU > is stopped when the stopping CPU is close to call rtas_stop_self(). Since > pseries_mach_cpu_die() sets the CPU current state to offline almost > immediately before calling rtas_stop_self(), we use that as a signal that > it is either already stopped or very close to that point, and we can start > the busy loop. > > As suggested by Michael Ellerman, this patch also changes the busy loop to > wait for a fixed amount of wall time. Based on the measurements that > Gautham did on a POWER9 system, in successful cases of > smp_query_cpu_stopped(cpu) returning affirmative, the maximum time spent > inside the loop was was 10 ms. This patch loops for 20 ms just be sure. > > Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
Thanks for this version. I have tested the patch and we no longer see the "Querying DEAD? cpu X (Y) shows 2" message.
Tested-and-Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-- Thanks and Regards gautham.
| |