Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 12 Mar 2019 09:48:11 +0100 | Subject | Re: New syscalls (was: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pidfd tree with the y2038 tree (now block and tip trees)) | From | Christian Brauner <> |
| |
On March 12, 2019 9:31:33 AM GMT+01:00, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: >On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 10:43 PM Christian Brauner ><christian@brauner.io> wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 10:38:07PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> > On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 9:36 AM Geert Uytterhoeven ><geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: >> > > >> > > Shall each architcture maintainer take care of this hxxself, or >will >> > > this be done in >> > > a coordinated way? >> > >> > I was planning to send a patch for all architectures this time >> > (after all three sets are merged, which is now), and ask future >> >> Just to clarify, are you referring to your sets? I think Linus hasn't >> gotten around to reviewing the PR for pidfd_send_signal() yet. :) > >Ah, I thought he had already merged both, the confusion was on >my end.
I think I'll do a GIT PULL RESEND later today since I sent the original pr last Tuesday.
Christian
> > Arnd
| |