| From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <> | Subject | [PATCH 4.19 076/149] bpf: sock recvbuff must be limited by rmem_max in bpf_setsockopt() | Date | Tue, 12 Mar 2019 10:08:14 -0700 |
| |
4.19-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
[ Upstream commit c9e4576743eeda8d24dedc164d65b78877f9a98c ]
When sock recvbuff is set by bpf_setsockopt(), the value must by limited by rmem_max. It is the same with sendbuff.
Fixes: 8c4b4c7e9ff0 ("bpf: Add setsockopt helper function to bpf") Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Acked-by: Lawrence Brakmo <brakmo@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> --- net/core/filter.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c index fb0080e84bd4..bed9061102f4 100644 --- a/net/core/filter.c +++ b/net/core/filter.c @@ -3909,10 +3909,12 @@ BPF_CALL_5(bpf_setsockopt, struct bpf_sock_ops_kern *, bpf_sock, /* Only some socketops are supported */ switch (optname) { case SO_RCVBUF: + val = min_t(u32, val, sysctl_rmem_max); sk->sk_userlocks |= SOCK_RCVBUF_LOCK; sk->sk_rcvbuf = max_t(int, val * 2, SOCK_MIN_RCVBUF); break; case SO_SNDBUF: + val = min_t(u32, val, sysctl_wmem_max); sk->sk_userlocks |= SOCK_SNDBUF_LOCK; sk->sk_sndbuf = max_t(int, val * 2, SOCK_MIN_SNDBUF); break; -- 2.19.1
|