lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Feb]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] tpm/tpm_crb: Avoid unaligned reads in crb_recv()
On Thu Feb 07 19, Sasha Levin wrote:
>Hi,
>
>[This is an automated email]
>
>This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag,
>fixing commit: 30fc8d138e91 tpm: TPM 2.0 CRB Interface.
>
>The bot has tested the following trees: v4.20.6, v4.19.19, v4.14.97, v4.9.154, v4.4.172.
>
>v4.20.6: Build OK!
>v4.19.19: Build OK!
>v4.14.97: Build OK!
>v4.9.154: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
> 13b1f4a571cc ("tpm_crb: map locality registers")
> b4e2eb0651ac ("tpm crb: Work around BIOS's that report the wrong ACPI region size")
>
>v4.4.172: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
> 13b1f4a571cc ("tpm_crb: map locality registers")

I'm guessing it is tripping over this not being applied

> 14ddfbf488a0 ("tpm_crb: drop struct resource res from struct crb_priv")
> 1bd047be37d9 ("tpm_crb: Use devm_ioremap_resource")
> 1e3ed59d6200 ("tpm_crb: Drop le32_to_cpu(ioread32(..))")
> 25112048cd59 ("tpm: rework tpm_get_timeouts()")
> 30f9c8c9e2ea ("tpm_crb/tis: fix: use dev_name() for /proc/iomem")
> 422eac3f7dea ("tpm_crb: fix mapping of the buffers")
> 4886cd80cb8e ("Revert "tmp/tpm_crb: implement runtime pm for tpm_crb"")
> 4d627e672bd0 ("tpm_tis: Do not fall back to a hardcoded address for TPM2")
> 51dd43dff74b ("tpm_tis: Use devm_ioremap_resource")
> 55a889c2cb13 ("tpm_crb: Use the common ACPI definition of struct acpi_tpm2")
> 7ab4032fa579 ("tpm_tis: Get rid of the duplicate IRQ probing code")
> 9514ff1961c6 ("tmp/tpm_crb: fix Intel PTT hw bug during idle state")
> aa77ea0e43dc ("tpm/tpm_crb: cache cmd_size register value.")
> ba5287b6ef6a ("tpm/tpm_crb: implement tpm crb idle state")
> e17acbbb69d3 ("tpm/tpm_crb: implement tpm crb idle state")
> e350e24694e4 ("tmp/tpm_crb: implement runtime pm for tpm_crb")
> e3837e74a06d ("tpm_tis: Refactor the interrupt setup")
> ef7b81dc7864 ("tpm_tis: Disable interrupt auto probing on a per-device basis")
>
>
>How should we proceed with this patch?
>
>--
>Thanks,
>Sasha

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-02-07 17:54    [W:0.325 / U:0.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site