lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Feb]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] mm/memory-hotplug: Add sysfs hot-remove trigger
On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 05:03:53PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> ARCH_MEMORY_PROBE is a useful thing for testing and debugging hotplug,
> but being able to exercise the (arguably trickier) hot-remove path would
> be even more useful. Extend the feature to allow removal of offline
> sections to be triggered manually to aid development.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> ---
>
> This is inspired by a previous proposal[1], but in coming up with a
> more robust interface I ended up rewriting the whole thing from
> scratch. The lack of documentation is semi-deliberate, since I don't
> like the idea of anyone actually relying on this interface as ABI, but
> as a handy tool it felt useful enough to be worth sharing :)

Hi Robin,

I think this might come in handy, especially when trying to test hot-remove
on arch's that do not have any means to hot-remove memory, or even on virtual
platforms that do not have yet support for hot-remove depending on the platform,
like qemu/arm64.


I could have used this while testing hot-remove on other archs for [1]

>
> Robin.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/22d34fe30df0fbacbfceeb47e20cb1184af73585.1511433386.git.ar@linux.vnet.ibm.com/
>

> + if (mem->state != MEM_OFFLINE)
> + return -EBUSY;

We do have the helper "is_memblock_offlined()", although it is only used in one place now.
So, I would rather use it here as well.

> +
> + ret = lock_device_hotplug_sysfs();
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (device_remove_file_self(dev, attr)) {
> + __remove_memory(pfn_to_nid(start_pfn), PFN_PHYS(start_pfn),
> + MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE * sections_per_block);

Sorry, I am not into sysfs inners, but I thought that:
device_del::device_remove_attrs::device_remove_groups::sysfs_remove_groups
would be enough to remove the dev attributes.
I guess in this case that is not enough, could you explain why?


[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10775339/
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE L3

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-02-07 14:37    [W:0.059 / U:0.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site