lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Feb]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4.9 30/30] fanotify: fix handling of events on child sub-directory
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 12:44 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> 4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
> ------------------
>
> From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
>
> commit b469e7e47c8a075cc08bcd1e85d4365134bdcdd5 upstream.
>
> When an event is reported on a sub-directory and the parent inode has
> a mark mask with FS_EVENT_ON_CHILD|FS_ISDIR, the event will be sent to
> fsnotify() even if the event type is not in the parent mark mask
> (e.g. FS_OPEN).
>
> Further more, if that event happened on a mount or a filesystem with
> a mount/sb mark that does have that event type in their mask, the "on
> child" event will be reported on the mount/sb mark. That is not
> desired, because user will get a duplicate event for the same action.
>
> Note that the event reported on the victim inode is never merged with
> the event reported on the parent inode, because of the check in
> should_merge(): old_fsn->inode == new_fsn->inode.
>
> Fix this by looking for a match of an actual event type (i.e. not just
> FS_ISDIR) in parent's inode mark mask and by not reporting an "on child"
> event to group if event type is only found on mount/sb marks.
>
> [backport hint: The bug seems to have always been in fanotify, but this
> patch will only apply cleanly to v4.19.y]
>

Same comment about this backport hint being misleading in the
context of the backport patch.

> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.19
> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> [amir: backport to v4.9]
> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
>
> ---
> fs/notify/fsnotify.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/fs/notify/fsnotify.c
> +++ b/fs/notify/fsnotify.c
> @@ -101,9 +101,9 @@ int __fsnotify_parent(struct path *path,
> parent = dget_parent(dentry);
> p_inode = parent->d_inode;
>
> - if (unlikely(!fsnotify_inode_watches_children(p_inode)))
> + if (unlikely(!fsnotify_inode_watches_children(p_inode))) {
> __fsnotify_update_child_dentry_flags(p_inode);
> - else if (p_inode->i_fsnotify_mask & mask) {
> + } else if (p_inode->i_fsnotify_mask & mask & ~FS_EVENT_ON_CHILD) {
> struct name_snapshot name;
>
> /* we are notifying a parent so come up with the new mask which
> @@ -207,6 +207,10 @@ int fsnotify(struct inode *to_tell, __u3
> else
> mnt = NULL;
>
> + /* An event "on child" is not intended for a mount mark */
> + if (mask & FS_EVENT_ON_CHILD)
> + mnt = NULL;
> +
> /*
> * Optimization: srcu_read_lock() has a memory barrier which can
> * be expensive. It protects walking the *_fsnotify_marks lists.
>
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-02-04 12:02    [W:0.251 / U:0.348 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site