Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 20 Feb 2019 15:39:03 -0700 | From | Jerry Snitselaar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add linux-security-module mailing list to TPM drivers |
| |
On Thu Feb 21 19, James Morris wrote: >On Wed, 20 Feb 2019, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > >> > being cc'd to linux-security-module? Looking back at >> > recent patches, it looked like it was a general request. >> > If it is, I'll be more likely to remember if get_maintainers.pl >> > brings it up. :) >> >> I'm all open here. Not sure which practices apply to IMA. I kind of tend >> to dilate to question does it make sense to CC to LSM for two reasons: >> >> 1. I think the original reason was that tpmdd mailing list was small. >> Now with the new linux-integrity mailing list up and running there is >> more eyes looking at the code. And more importantly the people are >> subscribed who use TPM for something, like IMA developers. >> 2. I don't remember ever reading within the time that I've been >> maintaining even a single comment from anyone that works with LSM's. The >> value of CC'ing there is not very significant, which means that most of >> the time the TPM traffic is just noise on that list. > >Sounds about right, there used to be more security folk on LSM and not as >many on the TPM list, but the new integrity list works well for TPM now. > > >-- >James Morris ><jmorris@namei.org> >
Okay. Ignore this patch then.
| |