Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [v6] coccinelle: semantic code search for missing put_device() | From | Markus Elfring <> | Date | Sun, 17 Feb 2019 13:00:47 +0100 |
| |
>> Would you dare to interpret my update suggestion (reordering of two identifiers) >> as a required SmPL script correction? > > I didn't suggest to reorder anything.
This is obvious according to your acknowledgement for the sixth version of this evolving SmPL script.
> Both are needed.
If you would insist on the specification of such an assignment exclusion for a SmPL ellipsis: Can we agree on a correct order?
> And, no I don't consider it to be a required suggestion.
Have we got a different view about an implementation detail at this place?
> In practice, reassigning such a variable is very unlikely.
This can be.
Regards, Markus
| |