| Date | Tue, 12 Feb 2019 10:29:12 -0800 (PST) | Subject | Re: [PATCH 00/32] softirq: Per vector masking v2 | From | David Miller <> |
| |
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 18:13:51 +0100
> For those who missed the infinitely invasive and carpal tunnel > unfriendly v1: https://lwn.net/Articles/768157/ > > Softirqs masking is an all or nothing operation. It's currently not > possible to disable a single vector. Yet some workloads are interested > in deterministic latencies for vectors execution. Reducing their > interdependencies is a first step toward that. > > Unlike the previous take, the current APIs aren't changed, as advised > by reviewers. But new APIs have been introduced. An individual vector > can be disabled and that behaviour can self-nest and nest with existing > APIs: ...
I really like this stuff, nice work:
Reviewed-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|