Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 11 Feb 2019 18:15:57 -0500 | From | Daniel Jordan <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/5] use pinned_vm instead of locked_vm to account pinned pages |
| |
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 03:54:47PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 05:44:32PM -0500, Daniel Jordan wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This series converts users that account pinned pages with locked_vm to > > account with pinned_vm instead, pinned_vm being the correct counter to > > use. It's based on a similar patch I posted recently[0]. > > > > The patches are based on rdma/for-next to build on Davidlohr Bueso's > > recent conversion of pinned_vm to an atomic64_t[1]. Seems to make some > > sense for these to be routed the same way, despite lack of rdma content? > > Oy.. I'd be willing to accumulate a branch with acks to send to Linus > *separately* from RDMA to Linus, but this is very abnormal. > > Better to wait a few weeks for -rc1 and send patches through the > subsystem trees.
Ok, I can do that. It did seem strange, so I made it a question...
| |