Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 19 Dec 2019 17:26:38 -0500 | From | Sasha Levin <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 277/350] tpm: Add a flag to indicate TPM power is managed by firmware |
| |
On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 02:17:31AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: >On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 10:05:52AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 9:57 AM Jarkko Sakkinen >> <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> wrote: >> > >> > On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 01:32:15PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 1:12 PM Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> >> > > > >> > > > [ Upstream commit 2e2ee5a2db06c4b81315514b01d06fe5644342e9 ] >> > > > >> > > > On some platforms, the TPM power is managed by firmware and therefore we >> > > > don't need to stop the TPM on suspend when going to a light version of >> > > > suspend such as S0ix ("freeze" suspend state). Add a chip flag, >> > > > TPM_CHIP_FLAG_FIRMWARE_POWER_MANAGED, to indicate this so that certain >> > > > platforms can probe for the usage of this light suspend and avoid >> > > > touching the TPM state across suspend/resume. >> > > > >> > > >> > > Are the patches needed to support CR50 (which need this patch) going >> > > to be applied to v5.4.y as well ? If not, what is the purpose of >> > > applying this patch to v5.4.y ? >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > Guenter >> > >> > Thanks Guenter. I think not. >> > >> Thought so. In that case this patch should be dropped. >> >> Guenter > >I fully agree with you.
I've dropped it, thanks!
-- Thanks, Sasha
| |