lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Dec]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: ufs: Put SCSI host after remove it
From
Date
On 12/16/19 4:46 PM, cang@codeaurora.org wrote:
> On 2019-12-17 01:39, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> Apparently some UFS drivers call ufshcd_remove() only and others
>> (PCIe) call both ufshcd_remove() and ufshcd_dealloc_host(). I think
>> that the above change will cause trouble for the PCIe driver unless
>> the ufshcd_dealloc_host() call is removed from ufshcd_pci_remove().
>
> You may get me wrong. I mean we should do like what ufshcd-pci.c does.
> As driver probe routine allocates SCSI host, then driver remove() should
> de-allocate it. Meaning ufs_qcom_remove() should call both ufshcd_remove()
> and ufshcd_dealloc_host().
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
> index 3d4582e..ea45756 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
> @@ -3239,6 +3239,7 @@ static int ufs_qcom_remove(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
>
>           pm_runtime_get_sync(&(pdev)->dev);
>           ufshcd_remove(hba);
>  +       ufshcd_dealloc_host(hba);
>           return 0;
>    }

Hi Can,

If it is possible to move the ufshcd_dealloc_host() into ufshcd_remove()
then I would prefer to do that. If all UFS transport drivers need that
call then I think that call should happen from the UFS core instead of
from the transport drivers.

Thanks,

Bart.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-12-17 02:17    [W:0.973 / U:0.376 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site