Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] arm64: dts: rockchip: RockPro64: hook up bluetooth at uart0 | From | Robin Murphy <> | Date | Thu, 12 Dec 2019 10:22:27 +0000 |
| |
Hi Soeren,
On 11/12/2019 11:52 pm, Soeren Moch wrote: > With enabled wifi support (required for firmware loading) for the > Ampak AP6359SA based wifi/bt combo module we now also can enable > the bluetooth part. > > Suggested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> > Signed-off-by: Soeren Moch <smoch@web.de> > --- > changes in v2: > - new patch > > Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> > Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> > Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org > Cc: brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@broadcom.com > Cc: brcm80211-dev-list@cypress.com > Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > --- > .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dts | 29 ++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dts > index 9fa92790d6e0..94cc462e234d 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dts > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dts > @@ -561,6 +561,20 @@ > }; > > &pinctrl { > + bt { > + bt_enable_h: bt-enable-h { > + rockchip,pins = <0 RK_PB1 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>; > + }; > + > + bt_host_wake_l: bt-host-wake-l { > + rockchip,pins = <0 RK_PA4 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_down>; > + }; > + > + bt_wake_l: bt-wake-l { > + rockchip,pins = <2 RK_PD3 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>; > + }; > + }; > + > buttons { > pwrbtn: pwrbtn { > rockchip,pins = <0 RK_PA5 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_up>; > @@ -729,8 +743,21 @@ > > &uart0 { > pinctrl-names = "default"; > - pinctrl-0 = <&uart0_xfer &uart0_cts>; > + pinctrl-0 = <&uart0_xfer &uart0_cts &uart0_rts>; > status = "okay"; > + > + bluetooth { > + compatible = "brcm,bcm43438-bt"; > + clocks = <&rk808 1>; > + clock-names = "extclk";
Is this right? Comparing the binding and the naming on the schematics, it seems more likely that this might be the LPO clock rather than the TXCO clock.
Robin.
> + device-wakeup-gpios = <&gpio2 RK_PD3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > + host-wakeup-gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PA4 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > + shutdown-gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PB1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > + pinctrl-names = "default"; > + pinctrl-0 = <&bt_host_wake_l &bt_wake_l &bt_enable_h>; > + vbat-supply = <&vcc3v3_sys>; > + vddio-supply = <&vcc_1v8>; > + }; > }; > > &uart2 { > -- > 2.17.1 > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-rockchip mailing list > Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip >
| |