lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Nov]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v1] mm/memory_hotplug: don't check the nid in find_(smallest|biggest)_section_pfn
On Thu 28-11-19 09:30:29, Qian Cai wrote:
>
>
> > On Nov 28, 2019, at 9:03 AM, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > That's why we have linux-next and plenty of people playing with it
> > (including you and me for example).
>
> As mentioned, it is an expensive development practice. Once a patch
> was merged into linux-next, it becomes someone else’s problems
> because if nobody flags it as problematic, all it needs is a good eye
> review and some time before it gets merged into mainline eventually.

I would tend to agree. linux-next shouldn't be considered a low bar
target. Things should be reviewed before showing up there. There are
obviously some exceptions, as always, but it shouldn't be over used.

I wish MM patches would be applied to mmotm (and linux-next) more
conservatively.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-11-28 15:42    [W:0.050 / U:0.868 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site