Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 28 Nov 2019 15:42:35 +0100 | From | Michal Hocko <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v1] mm/memory_hotplug: don't check the nid in find_(smallest|biggest)_section_pfn |
| |
On Thu 28-11-19 09:30:29, Qian Cai wrote: > > > > On Nov 28, 2019, at 9:03 AM, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > That's why we have linux-next and plenty of people playing with it > > (including you and me for example). > > As mentioned, it is an expensive development practice. Once a patch > was merged into linux-next, it becomes someone else’s problems > because if nobody flags it as problematic, all it needs is a good eye > review and some time before it gets merged into mainline eventually.
I would tend to agree. linux-next shouldn't be considered a low bar target. Things should be reviewed before showing up there. There are obviously some exceptions, as always, but it shouldn't be over used.
I wish MM patches would be applied to mmotm (and linux-next) more conservatively. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
| |