lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Oct]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 0/2] PCI: Add missing link delays
On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 05:15:24PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Am 07.10.19 um 11:32 schrieb Mika Westerberg:
> > On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 09:34:41AM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
> >> Am 04.10.19 um 15:06 schrieb Mika Westerberg:
> >>> On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 02:57:21PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
> >>>> Am 04.10.19 um 14:39 schrieb Mika Westerberg:
> >>>>> @Matthias, @Paul and @Nicholas, I appreciate if you could check that this
> >>>>> does not cause any issues for your systems.
> >>>> Just to be sure: is this intended to be applied against the 5.4-rc*
> >>>> master branch?
> >>> Yes, it applies on top of v5.4-rc1.
> >> I am sorry to say that I cannot currently test - my computer has a
> >> GeForce 1060-6GB an no onboard/on-chip graphics.
> >> The nvidia module 435.21 does not compile against 5.4-rc* for me (5.3.1
> >> was fine).
> > I think the two patches should apply cleanly on 5.3.x as well.
>
> Mika, that worked.
>
> With your two patches on top of Linux 5.3.4, two Suspend-to-RAM cycles
> (ACPI S3), one Suspend-to-disk cycle (ACPI S4),
> no regressions observed => success?

Yes, if it did not hang during resume (because of the PME loop) I think
it should be declared as success :)

Thanks a lot for testing!

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-10-08 11:06    [W:0.079 / U:1.148 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site