Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Dmitry Torokhov <> | Subject | [PATCH 6/7] regulator: tps65132: switch to using devm_fwnode_gpiod_get() | Date | Fri, 4 Oct 2019 16:10:16 -0700 |
| |
devm_fwnode_get_index_gpiod_from_child() is going away as the name is too unwieldy, let's switch to using the new devm_fwnode_gpiod_get().
Note that we no longer need to check for NULL as devm_fwnode_gpiod_get() will return -ENOENT if GPIO is missing.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> ---
drivers/regulator/tps65132-regulator.c | 17 ++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/tps65132-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/tps65132-regulator.c index e302bd01a084..7b0e38f8d627 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/tps65132-regulator.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/tps65132-regulator.c @@ -136,9 +136,10 @@ static int tps65132_of_parse_cb(struct device_node *np, struct tps65132_reg_pdata *rpdata = &tps->reg_pdata[desc->id]; int ret; - rpdata->en_gpiod = devm_fwnode_get_index_gpiod_from_child(tps->dev, - "enable", 0, &np->fwnode, 0, "enable"); - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(rpdata->en_gpiod)) { + rpdata->en_gpiod = devm_fwnode_gpiod_get(tps->dev, of_fwnode_handle(np), + "enable", GPIOD_ASIS, + "enable"); + if (IS_ERR(rpdata->en_gpiod)) { ret = PTR_ERR(rpdata->en_gpiod); /* Ignore the error other than probe defer */ @@ -147,10 +148,12 @@ static int tps65132_of_parse_cb(struct device_node *np, return 0; } - rpdata->act_dis_gpiod = devm_fwnode_get_index_gpiod_from_child( - tps->dev, "active-discharge", 0, - &np->fwnode, 0, "active-discharge"); - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(rpdata->act_dis_gpiod)) { + rpdata->act_dis_gpiod = devm_fwnode_gpiod_get(tps->dev, + of_fwnode_handle(np), + "active-discharge", + GPIOD_ASIS, + "active-discharge"); + if (IS_ERR(rpdata->act_dis_gpiod)) { ret = PTR_ERR(rpdata->act_dis_gpiod); /* Ignore the error other than probe defer */ -- 2.23.0.581.g78d2f28ef7-goog
| |