lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Oct]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 15/16] module: Move where we mark modules RO,X
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 10:43:00AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> But none of that explains why apply_alternatives() is also delayed.
>
> So I'm very tempted to just revert that patchset for doing it all
> wrong.

And I've done just that. This includes Josh's validation patch, the
revert and my klp_appy_relocations_add() patches with the removal of
module_disable_ro().

Josh, can you test or give me clue on how to test? I need to run a few
errands today, but I'll try and have a poke either tonight or tomorrow.

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git x86/rwx

After this it is waiting for Mark's argh64 patches to land:

https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191021163426.9408-5-mark.rutland@arm.com

And then we can go and delete module_disable_ro() entirely -- hooray!

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-10-25 12:07    [W:0.153 / U:0.348 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site