lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jan]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [Qestion] Softlockup when send IPI to other CPUs
Date
On 01/24/2019 10:07 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> Hi Shijith,
>
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 07:00:42AM +0000, Shijith Thotton wrote:
>> On 01/23/2019 11:45 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/flush.c b/arch/arm64/mm/flush.c
>>> index 30695a868107..5c9073bace83 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/flush.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/flush.c
>>> @@ -33,7 +33,11 @@ void sync_icache_aliases(void *kaddr, unsigned long len)
>>> __clean_dcache_area_pou(kaddr, len);
>>> __flush_icache_all();
>>> } else {
>>> - flush_icache_range(addr, addr + len);
>>> + /*
>>> + * Don't issue kick_all_cpus_sync() after I-cache invalidation
>>> + * for user mappings.
>>> + */
>>> + __flush_icache_range(addr, addr + len);
>>> }
>>> }
>>
>> We also faced similar issue with LTP test migrate_pages03 in past and this patch
>> fixes the issue.
>>
>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2019-January/623574.html
>
> Thanks for confirming. I presume I can add your tested-by.
>

Sure.

Tested-by: Shijith Thotton <sthotton@marvell.com>

Shijith

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-01-25 10:57    [W:0.067 / U:0.168 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site