Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] spi: Add Renesas R-Car Gen3 RPC-IF SPI controller driver | From | Sergei Shtylyov <> | Date | Thu, 24 Jan 2019 14:27:40 +0300 |
| |
On 01/24/2019 05:06 AM, masonccyang@mxic.com.tw wrote:
>> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 >> > +// >> > +// Copyright (C) 2018 ~ 2019 Renesas Solutions Corp. >> > +// Copyright (C) 2018 Macronix International Co., Ltd. >> > +// >> > +// R-Car Gen3 RPC-IF SPI/QSPI/Octa driver >> >> Do we really support Octa? > > yes and it needs to patch spi-nor layer and RPC driver for sure.
It?
>> > +// >> > +// Authors: >> > +// Mason Yang <masonccyang@mxic.com.tw> >> > +// >> [...] >> > +#include <asm/unaligned.h> >> [...] >> > + } else if (rx_buf) { >> > + // >> > + // RPC-IF spoils the data for the commands without an address >> > + // phase (like RDID) in the manual mode, so we'll have to work >> > + // around this issue by using the external address space read >> > + // mode instead. >> > + // >> > + if (!(smenr & RPC_SMENR_ADE(0xf))) { >> > + regmap_update_bits(rpc->regmap, RPC_CMNCR, >> > + RPC_CMNCR_MD, 0); >> > + regmap_write(rpc->regmap, RPC_DRCR, >> > + RPC_DRCR_RBURST(32) | RPC_DRCR_RBE); >> > + regmap_write(rpc->regmap, RPC_DREAR, RPC_DREAR_EAC(1)); >> > + regmap_write(rpc->regmap, RPC_DRCMR, rpc->cmd); >> > + regmap_write(rpc->regmap, RPC_DRDMCR, rpc->dummy); >> > + regmap_write(rpc->regmap, RPC_DROPR, 0); >> > + regmap_write(rpc->regmap, RPC_DRENR, smenr); >> > + memcpy_fromio(rx_buf, rpc->dirmap, rpc->xferlen); >> >> Just noticed: if rpc->dirmap is NULL (which is now allowed), we >> have a kernel oops >> here. :-( > > Do you patch your spi-mem.c ?
What do yuo mean? The only extra patch I have to apply now to renesas.git repo's devel branch is "mtd: devices: m25p80: Use the spi-mem dirmap API"...
> both dirmap_create() in your rpc driver and spi-mem layer should handle it well.
I just saw that you don't fail the driver's probe() method if devm_ioremap_resource() fails for the "dirmap" and "wbuf" resources...
>> [...] >> > +static const struct of_device_id rpc_spi_of_ids[] = { >> > + { .compatible = "renesas,r8a77995-rpc", }, >> >> Why (if it has no differences with the generic gen3 value below)? >> Please remove. > > By Geert's comments in dts, > > rpc: rpc@ee200000 { > compatible = "renesas,r8a7795-rpc", "renesas,rcar-gen3-rpc"; > reg = <0 0xee200000 0 0x200>, <0 0x08000000 0 0x4000000>, > <0 0xee208000 0 0x100>; > > I modified it to "renesas,r8a77995-rpc" because this is Soc I developed and validated.
Hopefully this matter is cleared up by Geert... :-)
> thanks, > Mason
MBR, Sergei
| |