Messages in this thread | | | From | Arnd Bergmann <> | Date | Tue, 22 Jan 2019 10:37:12 +0100 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 29/29] y2038: add 64-bit time_t syscalls to all 32-bit architectures |
| |
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 7:50 PM Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 8:25 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: > > I have a patch that I'll send soon to make x32 use its own table. As > far as I'm concerned, 547 is *it*. 548 is just a normal number and is > not special. But let's please not reuse 512..547 for other purposes > on x86 variants -- that way lies even more confusion, IMO.
(trimming Cc list, as this is getting a little off-topic most most)
Just so I understand: do you mean duplicating the .tbl file, or just the resulting table of entry points?
In either way, how will that work with the new io_uring_setup() system call that will have to use the compat entry point? Are you planning to use the same syscall number as x86_64 but point it to the compat function, or do we still need a new syscall number for x32 in the regular range?
Arnd
| |