Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] clang-format: Update .clang-format with the latest for_each macro list | From | Joe Perches <> | Date | Sat, 19 Jan 2019 11:45:07 -0800 |
| |
On Sat, 2019-01-19 at 20:32 +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > Hi Joe, > > On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 8:06 PM Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote: > > This misses all the directory/file specific #defines > > outside of include/ with for_each > > Indeed, the command only searches the include/ directory, but when > searching for the entire tree, it returns ~500 more entries (vs. the > ~300 original ones). I cannot recall if there was a reason to search > only inside include/, though. > > > $ git grep "#define.*for_each" | grep -v '^include' | wc -l > > 619 > > > > Is it possible to make this generic somehow instead? > > Perhaps extend .clang_format with regexes? > > > > (?:[a-z0-9_]+_)?for_each(?:_[a-z_]+) > > [a-z0-9_]+_for_each > > What do you mean?
Documentation for .clang-format shows https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ClangFormatStyleOptions.html
ForEachMacros (std::vector<std::string>)
A vector of macros that should be interpreted as foreach loops instead of as function calls.
These are expected to be macros of the form:
FOREACH(<variable-declaration>, ...) <loop-body>
In the .clang-format configuration file, this can be configured like:
ForEachMacros: ['RANGES_FOR', 'FOREACH']
For example: BOOST_FOREACH.
I suggest clang-format's ForEachMacros statement vector be expanded to support regexes ala
ForEachMacros: - Regex: '\b(?:(?:[a-z0-9_]+_)?for_each(?:_[a-z_]+)|[a-z0-9_]+_for_each)\b'
| |