Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 11 Jan 2019 12:39:13 +0000 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] regulator: core: add helper to check if regulator is disabled in suspend |
| |
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 10:24:26AM +0000, Claudiu.Beznea@microchip.com wrote: > On 09.01.2019 18:57, Mark Brown wrote:
> > regulator state which feels fragile. But based on the cover letter > > that's kind of like what the initial proposal about target states was so > > perhaps this is the way we end up going...
> Are you talking about [1] ?
I can't follow that link right now, I'm working offline.
> I can get rid of this patch, take advantage of [3] and [4] and introduce > also the regulator standby states. In this case, no matter the mapping b/w > Linux power saving modes and AT91 SoC's power saving modes, we will be > covered on misconfiguration (at least on SAMA5D2 Xplained board).
> And in patch 3/3 I could get rid of regulator checks and rely on DT (bad > thing would be that in case of no input for regulator's state in > mem/standby the board could not properly suspended/resumed), if any.
> What do you think about this?
Like I say I'm working offline so I can't check the links but it sounds like you're saying that the existing suspend mode configuration features are enough for your systems? If so that's great - certainly what you're saying above sounds sensible to me but it's possible I misunderstood something based on not having the links. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |