lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Sep]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/3] nvme-pci: use queue close instead of queue freeze
On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 10:19:27PM +0800, jianchao.wang wrote:
>
>
> On 09/06/2018 09:07 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 09:28:46AM +0800, jianchao.wang wrote:
> >> Hi Ming
> >>
> >> On 09/06/2018 06:09 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> >>> nvme_dev_add() still may call freeze & unfreeze queue, so your patch
> >>> can't avoid draining queue completely here.
> >>
> >> Yes, I know this. We still need to freeze queue when update nr_hw_queues.
> >> But we move forward a step at least. :)
> >> We don't need to drain request queue in normal case of nvme_reset_work.
> >
> > It is hard to say who is the normal case. In case of CPU hotplug, it is quite
> > easy to trigger updating nr_hw_queues.
> >
> >>
> >> As for updating nr_hw_queues, we could try some other method on it next.
> >
> > The thing is that draining queue may be inevitable inside reset work
> > function because of updating nr_hw_queues, that means the approach in
> > this patchset is just a partial solution
> >
> > Or it may not make sense to do that because we may never remove the draining
> > queue in the code path of updating nr_hw_queues.
> >
> > Given they belong to same issue, I suggest to solve them all.
>
> I still think if just prevent new IO, freeze queue is over-kill.
>
> With respect to update nr_hw_queues, we could try to take the bios down from the
> queued requests as the blk_steal_bios. Then re-issue these bios after updating the
> nr_hw_queues.

It is always easier to say than done, :-)

Please go ahead and post patches, and I am happy to review.


Thanks,
Ming

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-09-07 18:24    [W:0.158 / U:0.036 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site