lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Sep]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH] cpufreq: remove unnecessary unlikely()
Date
WARN_ON() already contains an unlikely(), so it's not necessary to wrap it
into another.

Signed-off-by: Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@huawei.com>
Cc: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index f53fb41efb7b..7aa3dcad2175 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -403,7 +403,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_freq_transition_begin);
void cpufreq_freq_transition_end(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
struct cpufreq_freqs *freqs, int transition_failed)
{
- if (unlikely(WARN_ON(!policy->transition_ongoing)))
+ if (WARN_ON(!policy->transition_ongoing))
return;

cpufreq_notify_post_transition(policy, freqs, transition_failed);
--
2.17.1
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-09-07 18:10    [W:0.032 / U:0.040 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site