Messages in this thread | | | From | Scott Wood <> | Date | Fri, 07 Sep 2018 15:25:04 -0500 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/3] soc: fsl: add RCPM driver |
| |
On Fri, 2018-08-31 at 11:52 +0800, Ran Wang wrote: > The NXP's QorIQ Processors based on ARM Core have RCPM module (Run > Control and Power Management), which performs all device-level > tasks associated with power management such as wakeup source control. > > This driver depends on FSL platform PM driver framework which help to > isolate user and PM service provider (such as RCPM driver). > > Signed-off-by: Chenhui Zhao <chenhui.zhao@nxp.com> > Signed-off-by: Ying Zhang <ying.zhang22455@nxp.com> > Signed-off-by: Ran Wang <ran.wang_1@nxp.com> > --- > drivers/soc/fsl/Kconfig | 6 ++ > drivers/soc/fsl/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/soc/fsl/ls-rcpm.c | 153 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 160 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 drivers/soc/fsl/ls-rcpm.c
Is there a reason why this is LS-specific, or could it be used with PPC RCPM blocks?
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/fsl/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/fsl/Kconfig > index 6517412..882330d 100644 > --- a/drivers/soc/fsl/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/Kconfig > @@ -30,3 +30,9 @@ config FSL_PLAT_PM > have to know the implement details of wakeup function it require. > Besides, it is also easy for service side to upgrade its logic > when > design changed and remain user side unchanged. > + > +config LS_RCPM > + bool "Freescale RCPM support" > + depends on (FSL_PLAT_PM)
Why is this parenthesized?
-Scott
| |