lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Sep]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 00/11] mscc: ocelot: add support for SerDes muxing configuration
    Hi Paul,

    On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 09:10:28AM -0700, Paul Burton wrote:
    > Hi Alexandre, Quentin, all,
    >
    > On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 05:16:53PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
    > > On 03/09/2018 22:09:10-0700, David Miller wrote:
    > > > From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
    > > > Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2018 15:45:22 +0200
    > > >
    > > > > On 03/09/2018 15:34:15+0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
    > > > >> > I suggest patches 1 and 8 go through MIPS tree, 2 to 5 and 11 go through
    > > > >> > net while the others (6, 7, 9 and 10) go through the generic PHY subsystem.
    > > > >>
    > > > >> Hi Quentin
    > > > >>
    > > > >> Are you expecting merge conflicts? If not, it might be simpler to gets
    > > > >> ACKs from each maintainer, and then merge it though one tree.
    > > > >
    > > > > There are some other DT changes for this cycle so those should probably
    > > > > go through MIPS.
    > > >
    > > > No objection for this going through the MIPS tree, and from me:
    > > >
    > > > Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
    > >
    > > What I meant was that 1/11 and 8/11 should go through MIPS because of
    > > the potential conflicts. The other patches can go through net-next as
    > > that will make more sense. Maybe Quentin can split the series in two,
    > > one for MIPS and one for net if that makes it easier for you to apply.
    >
    > I'd be happy to take the .dts changes through the MIPS tree, though
    > looking at them won't patch 1 break bisection?
    >
    > Since you remove the hsio reg entry it looks to me like
    > mscc_ocelot_probe() will fail with -EINVAL (which comes from
    > devm_ioremap_resource() with res=NULL) until patch 3.
    >

    That's correct.

    > I'd feel more comfortable merging this piecemeal if it doesn't result in
    > us breaking bisection for however long it takes for both the trees
    > involved to be merged.
    >

    How do you want to proceed then?

    Quentin
    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2018-09-04 20:00    [W:4.273 / U:0.484 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site