Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 4 Sep 2018 11:33:58 +0200 | From | jacopo mondi <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/5] Remove sh_mobile_ceu_camera from arch/sh |
| |
Hi again Sakari, sorry, I'm confusing you
On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 09:22:34AM +0200, jacopo mondi wrote: > Hi Sakari, > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 03:25:58PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote: > > Hi Jacopo, > > > > On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 06:37:06PM +0200, Jacopo Mondi wrote: > > > Hello, > > > this series removes dependencies on the soc_camera based > > > sh_mobile_ceu_camera driver from 3 board files in arch/sh and from one > > > sensor driver used by one of those boards. > > > > > > Hans, this means there are no more user of the soc_camera framework that I know > > > of in Linux, and I guess we can now plan of to remove that framework. > > > > What's the status of this set? I think it'd be nice to get it in; the CEU > > driver is the last using SoC camera framework. > >
The series went in in the media tree in late June and I now see it in v4.19-rc2.
Sorry for the confusion.
The other soc_camera series which is pending for approval is the one removing dependencies on the framework from some SH defconfigs: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/7/4/323
Mauro was exitant to take this one through the media tree, and he's probably right SH maintainers should at least ack the series. So far, I haven't heard from them.
I'll try to rebase it on latest version and re-send.
Thanks j
> > There's an open comment from Geert on this series. > I'll resend, then I guess it can be collected. > > > I guess an ack from the SH folks would be needed for these patches to go > > through the media tree. > > > > I would have loved to hear from them on this and other media patches > which are sh-related. It hasn't happen, and as for the previous patches > removing usage of the old ceu driver for SH boards, I guess this can go in > through the media tree. But I let Hans decide how to handle this. > > > On the sensor driver patches --- please just move the files. The CEU was > > the last that it was possible to use the drivers with. > > > > My understanding was that Hans preferred to do it after all > dependencies are moved away from soc_camera. > > Maybe at ELC-E we should have a status-check and decide how to move > forward with soc_camera deprecation. > > Thanks > j > > > -- > > Kind regards, > > > > Sakari Ailus > > e-mail: sakari.ailus@iki.fi
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |