lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Sep]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 10/11] arm64: dts: qcom: Add reg-names for all tsens nodes
    On Tue 28 Aug 06:38 PDT 2018, Amit Kucheria wrote:

    > Instead of showing up as thermal-sensor@<addr>, the nodes will show up as
    > tsens0_tm, tsen1_tm, tsens1_srot, etc. in /proc/iomem making it easier to
    > read.
    >
    > IOW,
    >
    > 0c222000-0c2221fe : thermal-sensor@c263000
    > 0c223000-0c2231fe : thermal-sensor@c265000
    > 0c263000-0c2631fe : thermal-sensor@c263000
    > 0c265000-0c2651fe : thermal-sensor@c265000
    >
    > becomes
    >
    > 0c222000-0c2221fe : tsens0_srot
    > 0c223000-0c2231fe : tsens1_srot
    > 0c263000-0c2631fe : tsens0_tm
    > 0c265000-0c2651fe : tsens1_tm
    >
    > Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>
    > Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
    > ---
    > arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi | 1 +
    > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916.dtsi | 1 +
    > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi | 2 ++
    > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 2 ++
    > 4 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
    >
    > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi
    > index 3c4b81c29798..64c9f81ddd90 100644
    > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi
    > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi
    > @@ -431,6 +431,7 @@
    > compatible = "qcom,msm8974-tsens";
    > reg = <0xfc4a9000 0x1000>, /* TM */
    > <0xfc4a8000 0x1000>; /* SROT */
    > + reg-names = "tsens_tm", "tsens_srot";

    While the iomem output seems more convenient this way, these register
    names are a contract between the DT binding and the particular tsens
    instance.

    As such this is a good idea, but with the names should not include the
    instance information. They should be "tm", "srot".

    > nvmem-cells = <&tsens_calib>, <&tsens_backup>;
    > nvmem-cell-names = "calib", "calib_backup";
    > #qcom,sensors = <11>;
    [..]
    > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
    > index 0c9a2aa6a1b5..f1a36d6829cf 100644
    > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
    > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
    > @@ -966,6 +966,7 @@
    > compatible = "qcom,sdm845-tsens", "qcom,tsens-v2";
    > reg = <0xc263000 0x1ff>, /* TM */
    > <0xc222000 0x1ff>; /* SROT */
    > + reg-names = "tsens0_tm", "tsens0_srot";
    > #qcom,sensors = <13>;
    > #thermal-sensor-cells = <1>;
    > };
    > @@ -974,6 +975,7 @@
    > compatible = "qcom,sdm845-tsens", "qcom,tsens-v2";
    > reg = <0xc265000 0x1ff>, /* TM */
    > <0xc223000 0x1ff>; /* SROT */
    > + reg-names = "tsens1_tm", "tsens1_srot";

    And I do recognize that in this case iomem won't show which one is
    tsens0 and which is tsens1...


    As with previous patches, please split arm and arm64 in separate
    patches.

    Regards,
    Bjorn

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2018-09-03 22:30    [W:2.576 / U:0.076 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site