lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Sep]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/6] pstore: Add event tracing support
On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 8:33 AM, Sai Prakash Ranjan
<saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> On 9/22/2018 10:07 PM, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
>>
>> On 9/22/2018 2:35 PM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 4:28 PM Sai Prakash Ranjan
>>> <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> +
>>>> + trace_seq_init(&iter->seq);
>>>> + iter->ent = fbuffer->entry;
>>>> + event_call->event.funcs->trace(iter, 0, event);
>>>> + trace_seq_putc(&iter->seq, 0);
>>>
>>>
>>> Would it be possible to store the binary trace record in the pstore
>>> buffer instead of outputting text? I suspect that will both be faster
>>> and less space.
>>>
>>
>> I will try this and come back.
>>
>
> Hi Joel,
>
> I removed trace_seq_putc and there is some improvement seen: 203 MB/s
>
> # dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null status=progress
> 12207371264 bytes (12 GB, 11 GiB) copied, 60 s, 203 MB/s^C
> 24171926+0 records in
> 24171926+0 records out
> 12376026112 bytes (12 GB, 12 GiB) copied, 60.8282 s, 203 MB/s
>
> This seems good when compared to 190 MB/s seen previously.
> If this is Ok, then I will spin v2 with changes suggested.

Sorry for slow reply, yes that sounds good and a worthwhile perf improvement.

thanks,

- Joel

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-09-25 22:37    [W:0.262 / U:0.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site