lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Sep]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/3] fuse: Solve request_find() bottleneck
From
Date
2 weeks passed, so ping.

Miklos, any reaction on this?

Thanks,
Kirill

On 11.09.2018 13:11, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We noticed the performance bottle neck in FUSE running our
> Virtuozzo storage over rdma. On some types of workload
> we observe 20% of time spent in request_find() in profiler.
> This function is iterating over long list of requests, and it
> scales bad.
>
> The patch introduces hash table to reduce the number
> of iterations, we do in this function. Also, algorithm
> of generating IDs for interrupt requests is changed,
> simplified request_find() function and killed
> fuse_req::intr_unique field.
>
> Kirill
> ---
>
> Kirill Tkhai (3):
> fuse: Change interrupt requests allocation algorhythm
> fuse: Kill fuse_req::intr_unique
> fuse: Use hash table to link processing request
>
>
> fs/fuse/dev.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> fs/fuse/fuse_i.h | 11 +++++------
> fs/fuse/inode.c | 5 ++++-
> 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> --
> Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-09-24 14:09    [W:0.310 / U:0.152 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site