Messages in this thread | | | From | Kees Cook <> | Date | Mon, 24 Sep 2018 10:35:24 -0700 | Subject | Re: [PATCH crypto-next 06/23] x86/fpu: Remove VLA usage of skcipher |
| |
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 4:45 AM, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> wrote: > On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 at 04:11, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote: >> >> In the quest to remove all stack VLA usage from the kernel[1], this >> replaces struct crypto_skcipher and SKCIPHER_REQUEST_ON_STACK() usage >> with struct crypto_sync_skcipher and SYNC_SKCIPHER_REQUEST_ON_STACK(), >> which uses a fixed stack size. >> >> [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+55aFzCG-zNmZwX4A2FQpadafLfEzK6CC=qPXydAacU1RqZWA@mail.gmail.com >> >> Cc: x86@kernel.org >> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> > > Doing some archeology on this driver, it turns out that the FPU > wrapper was introduced to support combining the generic CTR, LRW, XTS > and PCBC chaining modes with the AES-NI core transform. In the mean > time, CTR, LRW and XTS support have been implemented natively, which > leaves pcbc-aes-aesni as the only remaining user of the fpu template. > > Since there are no users of pcbc(aes) in the kernel, could we perhaps > just remove this driver and all the special handling we have for it in > aesni-intel_glue.c?
Both options get rid of the VLA, so I'm happy either way. ;)
> If not, or in case we prefer to defer that to the next release: > > Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Thanks!
-Kees
-- Kees Cook Pixel Security
| |