lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Sep]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] iio: adc: at91: fix wrong channel number in triggered buffer mode
From


On 22 September 2018 12:48:49 BST, Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 11:36:16AM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 15:26:03 +0800
>> kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Eugen,
>> This one is leaving me stumped...
>>
>> Anyone care to point out what I'm missing that is wrong here?
>>
>> Also Eugen, please don't cc stable on a patch directly. It is fine
>to send
>> a backport request once a patch has hit mainline, but before that
>it's just
>> adding noise to a list as they won't take it directly anyway.
>
>Song is correct on this one.
>
>So, just replace the declaration to:
>
> struct iio_chan_spec const *chan;
>
>and then warning goes away...

Good point. Not enough coffee this morning..

Obvious now :)
>
>Another thing, its better not to reply the automated bot and instead to
>the author by changing "From" address. :)
>
>That is what I do often when replying to that thread.
>
>https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20180921182616.GA2077@himanshu-Vostro-3559/
>
>And it nests properly in the given thread avoiding any noise to kbuild
>bot.



--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-09-22 14:51    [W:0.034 / U:0.524 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site