Messages in this thread | | | From | David Howells <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the vfs tree | Date | Thu, 20 Sep 2018 17:20:58 +0100 |
| |
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> wrote:
> I realise these are in samples rather than selftests, but what most of > the selftests do is just #define the syscall number if it's not defined, > so that you're not dependent on getting the headers.
The reason I don't want to do that is that syscall numbers aren't consistent across arches - they aren't even consistent within arches.
I've made the VFS samples contingent on X86 in Kconfig for the moment.
David
| |