Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 20 Sep 2018 19:18:25 +0530 | From | Balakrishna Godavarthi <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] Bluetooth: hci_qca: Add poweroff support during hci down for wcn3990 |
| |
Hi Matthias,
On 2018-09-19 22:51, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 08:51:13PM +0530, Balakrishna Godavarthi wrote: >> This patch enables power off support for hci down and power on support >> for hci up. As wcn3990 power sources are ignited by regulators, we >> will >> turn off them during hci down, i.e. an complete power off of wcn3990. >> So while hci up, we will call vendor specific open/close and setup >> which >> will turn on the regulators, requests BT chip version and download the >> firmware. >> >> Signed-off-by: Balakrishna Godavarthi <bgodavar@codeaurora.org> >> --- >> drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c >> index 74f5fede0274..c3038afa42af 100644 >> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c >> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c >> @@ -168,6 +168,7 @@ struct qca_serdev { >> >> static int qca_power_setup(struct hci_uart *hu, bool on); >> static void qca_power_shutdown(struct hci_uart *hu); >> +static int qca_power_off(struct hci_dev *hdev); >> >> static void __serial_clock_on(struct tty_struct *tty) >> { >> @@ -1099,8 +1100,26 @@ static int qca_set_speed(struct hci_uart *hu, >> enum qca_speed_type speed_type) >> static int qca_wcn3990_init(struct hci_uart *hu) >> { >> struct hci_dev *hdev = hu->hdev; >> + struct qca_serdev *qcadev; >> int ret; >> >> + /* Check for vregs status, may be hci0 down has turned >> + * off the vregs. >> + */ > > nit: it's not necessarily 'hci0', there may be systems with more than > one Bluetooth controller. You could say hciN instead, you might also > want to put quotes around 'hciN down' to make clearer this is > referring to a command. > [Bala]: will update.
>> + qcadev = serdev_device_get_drvdata(hu->serdev); >> + if (qcadev->bt_power->vregs_on == false) { > > nit: > if (!qcadev->bt_power->vregs_on) { > > is more common and easier to read IMO >
[Bala]: will update.
>> + serdev_device_close(hu->serdev); >> + ret = qca_power_setup(hu, true); >> + if (ret) >> + return ret; >> + >> + ret = serdev_device_open(hu->serdev); >> + if (ret) { >> + bt_dev_err(hu->hdev, "failed to open port"); > > switch the regulators off again?
[Bala]: it is not required to call the regulators off, when the serdev open fails. as the non zero return status will call the hci_dev_do_close() i.e. hdev->shutdown() > >> + return ret; >> + } >> + } >> + >> /* Forcefully enable wcn3990 to enter in to boot mode. */ >> host_set_baudrate(hu, 2400); >> ret = qca_send_power_pulse(hdev, QCA_WCN3990_POWEROFF_PULSE); >> @@ -1152,6 +1171,12 @@ static int qca_setup(struct hci_uart *hu) >> >> if (qcadev->btsoc_type == QCA_WCN3990) { >> bt_dev_info(hdev, "setting up wcn3990"); >> + >> + /* Enable NON_PERSISTENT_SETUP QUIRK to ensure to execute >> + * setup for every hci0 up. > > nit: 'hciN up'?
[Bala]: will update.
> >> + */ >> + set_bit(HCI_QUIRK_NON_PERSISTENT_SETUP, &hdev->quirks); >> + hu->hdev->shutdown = qca_power_off; >> ret = qca_wcn3990_init(hu); >> if (ret) >> return ret; >> @@ -1242,6 +1267,14 @@ static void qca_power_shutdown(struct hci_uart >> *hu) >> qca_power_setup(hu, false); >> } >> >> +static int qca_power_off(struct hci_dev *hdev) >> +{ >> + struct hci_uart *hu = hci_get_drvdata(hdev); >> + >> + qca_power_shutdown(hu); > > Would it make sense to add a return value qca_power_shutdown() now > that it is called by a non-void function? Might not be worth the > hassle though, hci_dev_do_close() - the only caller of > hdev->shutdown() - doesn't check the return value either. >
[Bala]: even i felt the same, but hci_dev_do_close() is not checking for the status.
> Cheers > > Matthias
-- Regards Balakrishna.
| |