lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Sep]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] net: mvpp2: avoid bouncing buffers
On 08/27 08:48:43, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> WE should basically never have dev->dma_mask = &dev->coherent_dma_mask,
> so until that is the case you are doctoring around the symptoms and
> not the problem.
>
> Does the patch below help your case?

Yes. Just tested it. Works great.

I see how this patch addresses the issue in the platform code instead of
the driver code. Thanks.

> ----
> From 6294e0e330851ee06e66ab85b348f1d92d375d7a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 17:23:24 +0200
> Subject: driver core: initialize a default DMA mask for platform device
>
> We still treat devices without a DMA mask as defaulting to 32-bits for
> both mask, but a few releases ago we've started warning about such
> cases, as they require special cases to work around this sloppyness.
> Add a dma_mask field to struct platform_object so that we can initialize
> the dma_mask pointer in struct device and initialize both masks to
> 32-bits by default. Architectures can still override this in
> arch_setup_pdev_archdata if needed.
>
> Note that the code looks a little odd with the various conditionals
> because we have to support platform_device structures that are
> statically allocated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
> drivers/base/platform.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> include/linux/platform_device.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c
> index dff82a3c2caa..baf4b06cf2d9 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/platform.c
> @@ -225,6 +225,17 @@ struct platform_object {
> char name[];
> };
>
> +static void setup_pdev_archdata(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + if (!pdev->dev.coherent_dma_mask)
> + pdev->dev.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
> + if (!pdev->dma_mask)
> + pdev->dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
> + if (!pdev->dev.dma_mask)
> + pdev->dev.dma_mask = &pdev->dma_mask;
> + arch_setup_pdev_archdata(pdev);
> +};
> +
> /**
> * platform_device_put - destroy a platform device
> * @pdev: platform device to free
> @@ -271,7 +282,7 @@ struct platform_device *platform_device_alloc(const char *name, int id)
> pa->pdev.id = id;
> device_initialize(&pa->pdev.dev);
> pa->pdev.dev.release = platform_device_release;
> - arch_setup_pdev_archdata(&pa->pdev);
> + setup_pdev_archdata(&pa->pdev);
> }
>
> return pa ? &pa->pdev : NULL;
> @@ -472,7 +483,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_device_del);
> int platform_device_register(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> device_initialize(&pdev->dev);
> - arch_setup_pdev_archdata(pdev);
> + setup_pdev_archdata(pdev);
> return platform_device_add(pdev);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_device_register);
> diff --git a/include/linux/platform_device.h b/include/linux/platform_device.h
> index 1a9f38f27f65..d84ec1de6022 100644
> --- a/include/linux/platform_device.h
> +++ b/include/linux/platform_device.h
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ struct platform_device {
> int id;
> bool id_auto;
> struct device dev;
> + dma_addr_t dma_mask;

Hmm.. should struct device use dma_addr_t instead of u64 for masks too?

> u32 num_resources;
> struct resource *resource;
>
> --
> 2.18.0
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-09-02 04:10    [W:0.973 / U:0.112 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site