lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Sep]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/4] iio: gyro: add support for fxas21002c
On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 07:43:48 +0100
Afonso Bordado <afonsobordado@az8.co> wrote:

> On Mon, 2018-08-27 at 18:08 +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Sat, 25 Aug 2018 22:19:07 +0100
> > Afonso Bordado <afonsobordado@az8.co> wrote:
> >
> > > FXAS21002C is a 3 axis gyroscope with integrated temperature sensor
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Afonso Bordado <afonsobordado@az8.co>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Driver is pretty clean so only a few minor comments inline.
> > If we were late in a cycle I'd probably just have taken it and fixed
> > up
> > but as we have lots of time and I'm inherently lazy I'll let you do a
> > v2 :)
> >
> > Good job, thanks!
> >
> > Jonathan
>
> Great!
>
>
> > > +
> > > +static const struct regmap_access_table fxas21002c_volatile_table
> > > = {
> > > + .yes_ranges = fxas21002c_volatile_ranges,
> > > + .n_yes_ranges = ARRAY_SIZE(fxas21002c_volatile_ranges),
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +const struct regmap_config fxas21002c_regmap_config = {
> > > + .reg_bits = 8,
> > > + .val_bits = 8,
> > > +
> > > + .max_register = FXAS21002C_REG_CTRL_REG3,
> > > + // We don't specify a .rd_table because everything is readable
> >
> > /* ... */
> >
> > Please run checkpatch as IIRC it complains about this.
>
> I've replaced all instances of C99 comments with ANSI comments.
> However, has Joe Perches mentioned. Checkpatch did not warn me about
> this.
>
Yup, thanks to Joe for clarifying this I had missed the change.
>
> > > +
> > > +static int fxas21002c_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> > > +{
> > > + struct iio_dev *indio_dev = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> > > + struct fxas21002c_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > > +
> > > + iio_device_unregister(indio_dev);
> > > +
> > > + fxas21002c_set_operating_mode(data, FXAS21002C_OM_STANDBY);
> >
> > You could have used the devm_add_action to allow the managed cleanup
> > to handle
> > this and hence gotten rid of the remove function.
> >
> > (minor suggestion and somewhat a matter of personal taste).
>
> I didn't know this existed! Changed in v2.

Nor me until someone used it in a driver a few months back ;)
One of the advantages of doing a lot of review is that you get to see
any new stuff other people use.

Jonathan

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-09-02 11:18    [W:0.047 / U:1.504 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site