Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 16/18] LSM: Allow arbitrary LSM ordering | From | Casey Schaufler <> | Date | Mon, 17 Sep 2018 16:30:54 -0700 |
| |
On 9/17/2018 4:20 PM, Kees Cook wrote: > On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 4:10 PM, Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> wrote: >> Landlock, because it target unprivileged users, should only be called >> after all other major (access-control) LSMs. The admin or distro must >> not be able to change that order in any way. This constraint doesn't >> apply to current LSMs, though.
What harm would it cause for Landlock to get called before SELinux? I certainly see why it seems like it ought to get called after, but would it really make a difference?
> Good point! It will be easy to add LSM_ORDER_LAST, though, given the > machinery introduced in this series. > > -Kees >
| |