Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 17 Sep 2018 02:03:40 +0100 | From | Lee Jones <> | Subject | Re: [BUG] mfd: ezx-pcap: Possible sleep-in-atomic-context bugs in pcap_adc_irq() |
| |
On Sat, 15 Sep 2018, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> The driver may sleep in an interrupt handler. > The function call paths (from bottom to top) in Linux-4.17 are: > > [FUNC] mutex_lock_nested > drivers/mfd/ezx-pcap.c, 272: > mutex_lock_nested in pcap_adc_irq (interrupt handler) > > [FUNC] mutex_lock_nested > drivers/mfd/ezx-pcap.c, 100: > mutex_lock_nested in ezx_pcap_read > drivers/mfd/ezx-pcap.c, 281: > ezx_pcap_read in pcap_adc_irq (interrupt handler) > > [FUNC] mutex_lock_nested > drivers/mfd/ezx-pcap.c, 85: > mutex_lock_nested in ezx_pcap_write > drivers/mfd/ezx-pcap.c, 285: > ezx_pcap_write in pcap_adc_irq (interrupt handler) > > [FUNC] mutex_lock_nested > drivers/mfd/ezx-pcap.c, 244: > mutex_lock_nested in pcap_adc_trigger > drivers/mfd/ezx-pcap.c, 299: > pcap_adc_trigger in pcap_adc_irq (interrupt handler) > > These bugs are found by my static analysis tool DSAC.
Not sure what you want me to do with this.
Do you have something in mind?
-- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Linaro Services Technical Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
| |