lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Sep]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] ring-buffer: Allow for rescheduling when removing pages
Hi Steven,

Does the patch look good? Can this be picked up in the next rc?

Vaibhav

On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 3:31 PM Vaibhav Nagarnaik <vnagarnaik@google.com> wrote:
>
> When reducing ring buffer size, pages are removed by scheduling a work
> item on each CPU for the corresponding CPU ring buffer. After the pages
> are removed from ring buffer linked list, the pages are free()d in a
> tight loop. The loop does not give up CPU until all pages are removed.
> In a worst case behavior, when lot of pages are to be freed, it can
> cause system stall.
>
> After the pages are removed from the list, the free() can happen while
> the work is rescheduled. Call cond_resched() in the loop to prevent the
> system hangup.
>
> Reported-by: Jason Behmer <jbehmer@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Nagarnaik <vnagarnaik@google.com>
> ---
> kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> index 1d92d4a982fd..65bd4616220d 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> @@ -1546,6 +1546,8 @@ rb_remove_pages(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer, unsigned long nr_pages)
> tmp_iter_page = first_page;
>
> do {
> + cond_resched();
> +
> to_remove_page = tmp_iter_page;
> rb_inc_page(cpu_buffer, &tmp_iter_page);
>
> --
> 2.19.0.rc2.392.g5ba43deb5a-goog
>
[unhandled content-type:application/pkcs7-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-09-17 22:54    [W:0.983 / U:0.724 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site