[lkml]   [2018]   [Sep]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] dt-bindings: power: Introduce suspend states supported properties
* Sudeep Holla <> [180912 11:41]:
> On 12/09/18 12:19, Keerthy wrote:
> > suspend to mem and suspend to disk are pretty generic states and i agree
> > implementation is platform dependent so why not have properties that
> > convey if they are supported?
> >
> We already have power domains and idle states for that. If you need to
> restrict few states on some platform for whatever reasons, just disable
> those states. I don't see the need to add any more bindings for the same.

Oh do you mean the "domain-idle-states" property as mentioned in the

Yeah that should do and the DOMAIN_PWR_DN and DOMAIN_RET can be SoC
specific and then the board can select which ones to use depending on
how things are wired for GPIOs, memory, PMIC and so on.

Hmm I don't see any users for this binding though?



 \ /
  Last update: 2018-09-12 15:33    [W:0.057 / U:2.204 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site